Insider to Empire: J. F. Carruth

By Galway Moss
1 August 2008

In early August, Fire Eater Editor, Galway Moss received a call from an anonymous "Mr Carruth" from, so he said, the State Department. As Moss and Carruth talked, it occurred to Mr Moss that the Fire Eater readers might appreciate the kind of insider knowledge which Carruth obviously had. An interview was set up, and what follows is part of that interview.

Galway Moss (GM): Good evening, Mr Carruth.

J. F. Carruth (JFC): Good evening.

GM: For our readers, I should explain that Mr Carruth is what Hollywood would call a “highly placed resource” within the federal government. Exactly how high, and what his real name may be, I am not permitted to say, by prior agreement with Mr Carruth. But given what he’s told to me, I can see why he would have to remain anonymous. I would like to thank you for contacting us. But our readers would be interested in why you chose to contact the Fire Eater.

JFC: I’ve read the Fire Eater for several years now, and have always enjoyed its stance; which is, to say the least, somewhat unusual in today’s Internet world. As a Southerner, my sympathies obviously lie south of the Mason-Dixon Line, but the Fire Eater is unique in presenting not merely, as you have said often, just another “battle-flag” site. The Fire Eater presents Southern culture in its entirety, from politics to art, and it is known for offering up both “sides” of the cultural debate.

GM: That’s certainly true of this issue, with an article on the Yankee composer, Stephen Foster!

JFC: Whose daddy, by the way, was from Virginia, my home state.

GM: I didn’t know that. Explains a few of Foster’s lyrics, though.

JFC: Indeed.

GM: As a DC “insider,” you have access to information hidden from the majority of Americans. Would that be an accurate statement?

JFC: Accurate.

GM: And as a DC “insider,” what do you think is the most important thing Americans should know about their government, but don’t know?

JFC: Well, there are several things, actually, but they all revolve around a main point.

GM: Is this the “government-within-a-government” concept of which you spoke to me earlier?

JFC: Yes and no. I like to think of it as a “government-outside-of-a-government” myself. But yes, in the sense in which you and I were speaking before.

GM: If I reckoned your reckoning rightly, you were asserting that the so-called “federal government” does not really run the country.

JFC. A lot of folks have already surmised that their government isn’t run the way the high-ups say it is. But I’m not talking any conspiracy theory here. There are conspiracies, and every day, but this isn’t really one of them. This is just the way things really are.

GM: Give us an overview, if you would.

JFC: Certainly. I’m guessing it would surprise most people to learn that the president, for example, is relatively low on the political totem pole. Not to say he does not wield power; he does. But his power is subject to a check, and not from either the legislative nor the judicial arms of the government. The president himself, to make a long story short, is what we on the hill called “watched.”

GM: Watched?

JFC: What that means is simple. The president is allowed to fulfill certain duties; to exercise certain powers. But he is not allowed to go beyond what we would call, and again I use a code word, “the Veil.”

GM: Sounds very Hollyweird.

JFC: Oh, it’s much more Hollywood than Hollywood. The George Clooney types would wet their pants if they knew the real truth behind either their precious “left” or hated “right.”

GM: What is “the Veil”?

JFC: The Veil is, first, not any secret group. It is, in fact, one man. And when I say one man, I mean man, and not woman. The Veil is never a woman and never will be. The power in the hands of the Veil is deemed incompatible with femininity.

GM: Why is that?

JFC: Because women, to be blunt, are considered at risk for hyper-emotionalism, a trait which could, in theory, “lift the Veil,” as the saying runs.

GM: Do you know who the Veil is?

JFC: Not for sure. I have a very good guess, though. I can not tell you or your readers, unfortunately, because doing so would give my identity away in a second. Let’s just say the Veil is someone you might ordinarily consider a “follower,” and not a leader.

GM: And you’re saying the Veil has more power than the president?

JFC: Precisely. It may sound absurd, but then, it’s supposed to sound absurd. The Veil, for example, decided on sending in the military to Iraq. At the time, in 2004, the president merely wanted to attack Afghanistan. He was overruled by the Veil.

GM: I’m guessing the Iraq decision was influenced by oil and oil money?

JFC: Interestingly, no. The common conception that petrodollars influence most everything is just straight out wrong. For one thing, those under the Veil have no need for dollars, petro or otherwise. They already control the wealth, and dollars are simply symbols of that wealth. The attack on Iraq was actually part of a much bigger, and much more ambitious plan, extending beyond the Middle Eastern theatre.

GM: That sounds like a most ambitious plan indeed.

JFC: Extending beyond mere empire also.

GM: Now that surprises me.

JFC: It should. The plan I’m speaking of involves more than empire; it involves cooperation among the ruling elites of other empires and even lesser powers. In fact, if the conspiracy theorists wanted a target, it would be the loose association of “Veils” from every power within the larger umbrella of power.

GM: Can you give me a concrete example of what this “umbrella” intends for the world; where it is aiming its power?

JFC: Sure. Most important, the Veil has decided that nationalism is more or less unimportant for its ends. Because of that decision, what we call America will slowly morph into something else, even surpassing its already mutated shape. And I don’t mean “globalism.” Globalism is too small a concept. The Veil is not interested in some global power structure; quite the opposite. If anything, the global power structure will best be seen as an oligarchy. An oligarchy made of those “Veils.”

GM: Ironic. We’re back 2600 or so years to ancient Greece.

JFC: Not only that, but again, the Veil is not after money. The “umbrella” already mints the money, and it has plenty. Money from the Veil’s view is just a control mechanism.

GM: Which makes sense, given the oligarchic nature of it.

JFC: Yes. Which also explains why America is, once again relatively unimportant to the Veil, at least in a national sense.

GM: What is important to the Veil?

JFC: Power. The ability to control local and global events in concert with a larger plan for both.

GM: You speak of a larger plan.

JFC: Part of that larger plan is not only eliminating nationalism, or at least the importance of it, but eliminating imperialism, oddly enough. After all, if you think about it, why would an empire be necessary if a larger “umbrella” power structure already is in place? I know several people who laugh at the various books on American imperialism precisely because of that umbrella structure. A structure, by the way, which does not have a name because it can not have a name. It merely is what it is and does what it does. Any “pullout” from Iraq will not be determined by either a Democrat or a Republican, but by the Veil. And only if that pullout accords with his larger plan. Right now, a pullout is out of the question. And when a pullout does come, you can bet it's because the Veil has assented to it, not Iraq and not the leftists here. Iraq is not a military threat; it is simply a strategic operation.

GM: That would suggest that American patriotism is somewhat useless.

JFC: Quite the opposite. What we call American patriotism is a valuable tool to the Veil, and beyond him, to the umbrella structure stretching across continents. American patriotism is considered a necessary component of the Veil’s power needs, his plan as I have called it. Think about it from an historical perspective. The War in 1861 to 1865, for example. Before that War, secession was considered by both North and South a rather harmless expediency. But after the War, secession became even more vilified in the real halls of power than in Lincoln’s relatively Lilliputian halls of power. Secession works against the centralizing tendency built into the Veil’s plan. After all, you can’t have a mess of tiny powers forever bothering the Veil’s front steps.

GM: That makes sense, from what you call the “Veil’s” viewpoint.

JFC: More than that, you can’t have the tiny powers of party politics interfering with the larger plan either. For that reason, it’s already been decided that if Obama is elected, he will be assassinated.

GM: You’re kidding now.

JFC: No. I’m not. Don’t get me wrong. Obama is not disliked; merely in the way if elected. My own guess is that’s why McCain was allowed to run. Because McCain is truly leftist, but also truly centrist. He poses no threat to the Veil. Obama would have to be silenced because his brand of leftism goes beyond the usual Jimmy Carter or Al Gore type of leftism. McCain’s leftism, on the other hand, works well with the overall plan as the Veil envisions it. Iraq is a good example. Obama really would pull out the troops. McCain would not. Which one do you think would fit the Veil’s plan more neatly?

GM: Which would suggest...

JFC: Kennedy? Exactly. Once again, think about the historical perspective. Who fit the Veil’s plan better: Kennedy or Nixon? If you’re thinking about Johnson, don’t. He was merely incompetent, and incompetency is a tool, not a liability.

GM: So, if I understand all this, and I’m only beginning to understand it, then what appears to be chaos, say, in the markets, for example, is really not chaos at all, but a defined order?

JFC: You got it. The Veil couldn’t possibly permit the eccentricities of a Wall Street to upset the apple cart. In general, you have to think backwards in a way to get the point. A recession is a tool also, not a liability. A nation, say America, is also a tool. If it gets in the way of building the plan, it’s a hammer which can be discarded.

GM: What about Iran? Everyone thinks Iran is such a big threat to America...

JFC: Iran is tucked safely away within the Veil’s plan. Remember to think backwards. Do you think that the Veil cares if Israel vanishes from the face of the earth? Or if a Middle East conflagration erupts because of Iranian causes? War is also a tool, not necessarily a liability.

GM: OK. My head’s spinning. I have a feeling that power of the sort you talk of is probably going to see this interview at some point also.

JFC: Of course. For that reason, I’ve not only hidden my identity, I’ve also hidden the real purposes of the Veil, for only those who know, well, know. And if I told you the real purposes of the Veil, the Veil would finger me quickly. But I think you get the picture so that you can put the pieces together and surmise the logical results.

GM: I thank you for your courage in talking to me, and to our audience. My own guess is the majority will think it a spoof.

JFC: Perhaps that’s a good thing...

GM: Because a spoof is not necessarily a liability, right?

JFC: Right. It’s a tool.